It is a great feeling to use C# in your project, because you will have the feeling that you are using a programming language that is very similar to Java. However, in the past year or so, there has been much discussion about the differences between the two languages. In this article, I will discuss some of the major differences between C# and Java.
With C#, the performance is a big factor, and in fact the language has its own optimizing compiler that is able to handle most of the overhead of a traditional runtime. On the other hand, Java has no such compilers that can turn the code into byte code, so the quality of the program is still not guaranteed. Java is not able to rely on any optimizing compiler, which means that the program’s runtime performance is not as good as C#’. On the other hand, there are other differences between C# and Java that you will not find in the book, which can be included here.
C# and CSharp (C# with a.NET) and also Xamarin have their own form of type casting. For instance, you cannot directly get the type of a method parameter that is being passed by reference. You will need to use the reflection APIs to get the type of a parameter. To compare this to Java, the Java APIs does not allow you to perform reflection on Java objects. For C#, you will be able to get the type of an object passed by reference.
When you use a C# IDE (integrated development environment), C# does not support the static type-checking facilities provided by JAVA. Java, on the other hand, can use the static type-checking facilities provided by the compiler. This is a big difference between C# and Java.
C# and CSharp provide better features for interior than Java. For instance, there is support for the# garbage collector, which is much more efficient than the garbage collector in Java. Additionally, C# has a method reference information facility that makes it easier to use the static reference types. The CLR (com.sun.org.declarative.runtime.ClassLoader) helps to organize the Java class loader.
C# has a much higher level of generics, which can help in various situations. For instance, generic type parameters allow building generic interfaces. C# also has support for the implementation inheritance mechanism. The CLR performs automated type safety checks and compiler checks, which allow to avoid many errors.C# 課程 is here.
Unlike Java, C# supports runtime reflection and subprogram template injection. These two features are particularly useful for security checks. In addition, in C#, it is much easier to refer to the fields and properties that are defined in a class by name, which can help in preventing a NullPointerException.
C# and CSharp have a less flexible class library, which makes it difficult to extend the capabilities of Java. In addition, C# supports a partial type system that makes it possible to get the type of a method parameter, while in Java this is not possible. C# and CSharp do not support null-type parameters, which is also one of the main reasons why many C# developers do not like to use it. On the other hand, C# has strong static typing, which is another reason why it is so popular.